What Is A Dissertation Prospectus
What Is The Difference Between A Dissertation Prospectus And A Proposal?
People commonly use the proposal/prospectus word interchangeably for thesis and academic projects. However, this is a wrong thing to do. Both these words are different from each other and have a different meaning because the requirements for a prospectus are different from that of a proposal. Read below to clarify your concepts between proposals and prospectus
The prospectus of a dissertation
The prospectus of a dissertation is something you write for your own department headed by your own professors. This means that you are not trying to win something or arguing over the importance of your paper. You do not have to ask the professors if this paper is acceptable for further research or not. In most cases, you simply are showing them the topic and area you have decided to move forward with. You definitely do not have to give them the background information about the subjects or arguments to show the history of the research. The format, requirements, length and style of this paper is similar to the requirements by your professors or university. This may change with various departments and institutes. Your prospectus does not have any chances of rejection because you are not even asking for an approval. The professors may suggest edits and revisions to improve the scope of your work
The proposal of dissertation
The proposal for your paper is different from the prospectus in a way because you submit it to an anonymous committee and you do not know the members of the committee that will judge your assignment. In this situation, you are entering a contest and need to make sure that you win and someone else loses. You must be able to have an approval from the committee members and the chances of the rejection are as much there as they are for approval. You do not have to explain the topic or scope of your research only but you should be able to convince your readers of your work. A student needs to adopt a persuasive tone in this style of paragraph and must be able to persuade the audience of the ideas he has. You need to show them that your ideas are valid and of critical importance. It is important for you to critically review and evaluate each sentence in your paper so that the committee members cannot question anything in your assignment
Once you have written your academic essay, do not rush to submit it to your professor. Spend much time searching for grammar and punctuation mistakes.
Rewriting and plagiarism
Plagiarism is a serious issue in the academic world. To avoid this from happening, make sure to rewrite and reword the parts you have copied from the Internet and cite it properly.
On the web
Buy thesis papers online at ThesisRush - the best writers on the web!
Need quickly make your essay? Order it here - www.ZEssay
Get your essay done with WriteMyEssayz.com - 24/7 online essay writing service.
Need help with essay? USessaywriters.com - professional essay writers.
Very good essay writing guide for college students.
Your humble blogger is currently knee-deep in dissertation prospectuses (prospecti?), a rather curious literary form. Here at the Fletcher School, a dissertation prospectus is a Ph.D. student’s attempt to describe his or her dissertation topic, including the central puzzle, the deficiencies in the existing literature, the proposed hypotheses and the testing strategy.
A prospectus runs about 60-80 pages and, to be blunt, is extremely painful to both authors and readers. It’s painful for the authors because, after having spent most of graduate school ripping what they read to intellectual shreds, they discover that coming up with their own original arguments is actually a pretty challenging experience. It’s painful for the readers because it’s the academic equivalent of teenage poetry — there’s a lot of strong feelings and beliefs surging through the text in a thoroughly out-of-control and ungainly manner (and that’s the final version of the prospectus — you can only imagine what the draft versions of these documents look like). Indeed, the adolescence metaphor works astonishingly well — I have engaged or witnessed many a conversation like the following:
Ph.D. ADVISOR: I think you should stop reading Wendt [or insert other trendy academic name here]. I don’t like the way his arguments are shaping your argument.
Ph.D. STUDENT: But you don’t understand!! I love him — as much as love can be socially constructed!! He’s let me see the world in a whole new way. He’s the key to everything!!!
Ph.D. ADVISOR: You’re writing a dissertation on cooperation among transnational criminal groups — I just don’t think his argument works here.
PH.D. STUDENT: How would you know which arguments work and which ones don’t?! When was the last time you read someone who moved you — the Stone Age?! I bet you’ve never read a piece of constructivist scholarship in your life. You don’t understand me at all!!!!!
Ph.D. ADVISOR: Calm down — I just think you might be better off if you read other people is all. This is just an intellectual crush. It will pass.
Ph.D. STUDENT!!! No!! Never!! I’ve never read anyone else who can speak to my topic like him. Wendt and I will stay together forever!!
Usually, the final dissertations look significantly better — and thank God for that.
As you might surmise, this is not an easy literary form to conquer, and in most cases is just a hoop that should be jumped through as quickly as possible. Reading a bunch of these back-to-back can cause one to start muttering about how grad students ain’t what they used to be and what-not. I am usually able to resist such mutterings by forcefully reminding myself that my own dissertation prospectus was such a bland and vague piece of crap ("I want to write something about sanctions") that I purged it from my hard drive as soon as possible in order to
thwart all my future biographers achieve some peace of mind.
Every once in a while, however, a Ph.D. student hits upon the delicate alchemy of fear and arrogance necessary to write an engaging prospectus that suggests an excellent dissertation. Maybe not even an excellent prospectus, but just a scintillating paragraph or two that suggests the student’s intellectual trajectory is really, really promising.
This morning I stumbled across one of those paragraphs in a fascinating prospectus on international water boundary disputes (really!), which I now share with you:
While other water law studies have attempted to analyze the origins of water law, the study of water law in ancient societies tends to be cursory and rife with misnomers and mistakes. For instance, most cite the Hammurabi Code as the oldest water law, when with little effort it is easily discoverable that both the codes of Lipit Ishtar and Ur Nammu both contain water provisions, pre-date Hammurabi by at least 250 years, and clearly provide the normative underpinnings on which the Hammurabi Code was constructed. This study will therefore seek to build a solid historical foundation on which to ground further analysis of modern transboundary water law.
It’s the phrase "easily discoverable" that tickled my intellectual fancy — and, fortunately, the rest of the prospectus appears to back up the promise of that paragraph.
It’s moments like these that forcefully remind me that, for all of the problems and pathologies with the modern academy, I really, really, really, really love my job.
Tags: Academia, international law, international relations theory, political science
More from Foreign Policy