1 Daijind

Thesis Statement For Julius Caesar

Just like all the other stories, the “Julius Caesar”, written by William Shakespeare, includes the following basic sections: the initial situation, the story conflict, climax, suspense and conclusive part. William Shakespeare didn’t go any other way, and made his “Julius Caesar” on the basis of typical “ingredients”.

Initial Situation

After killing his co-leader Pompey Julius Caesar returns to Rome. The whole irony lies within fact that common people celebrate the Roman triumph of an individual instead of the whole nation. The tension feels from the first page of the page and without a doubt, something is going to happen so that the tension could be finally broken.

Conflict of the Story

Julius Caesar’s longing for an absolute power disturbs those who believe that common people ignore the possible consequences of the upcoming of Julius Caesar’s tyranny. Although Cassius exerts every effort to incite Brutus to rebel, Brutus takes no notice of it and is moved by the fact that the empire should be greater than Julius. With the fake letter in his hands, Brutus realizes how bad the things are in Rome and that he is the only savior. His patriotic feelings must be higher than personal convictions regarding Julius Caesar.


The conspirators come to an agreement that nobody should touch the Antony’s body that worries Cassius. The conspirators easily pull off the murder, nonetheless, they are hurt by naive beliefs of Brutus. He truly believes that everyone around will worship them after they state real motivations behind their deeds: that they killed Julius Caesar only to bring the better future for Rome. The nation is all in panic, which means things went really wrong. Playing with Brutus’s trust, Anthony asks him whether he can deliver his speech at the funeral. Although Antony gives his word by saying he will never lay any blame, he actually plans to have Julius avenged by provoking the common people to start a riot.


Antony’s rhetoric gives him an opportunity to highlight all the wrongs the traitors have done to Julius Caesar. This gives the people a good motivation to be angry on Julius Caesar’s behalf. They walk the streets, shouting “Kill and burn!”. The whole situation pleases Antony. whose plan turns out just perfectly.


Everyone finally “wakes up” when Brutus announces that Portia is dead. This, in turn, brings some light on how useless was Brutus in this fight. Julius Caesar’s ghost appears and Brutus, being braver than ever before, is sure to meet the ghost. Cassius sums up his life in a very poetic way – his birthday comes, so if he passes away today, this means his life have reached the full circle. Two comrades agree to never come back in chains, which means that they will commit suicide before the moment of dishonor.


When reaching up the end of the play, one sees how it all played in the world history. Cassius and Brutus commit suicide when they are sure their battle against Antony is lost. Having taken the field, where Brutus fell, Antony and Octavius proclaim him to be the noblest man. Unluckily, Brutus is a little bit too dead to know his new status and the situation doesn’t worry him anymore.

This was an example of Julius Caesar essay, written by the writers of our custom writing service. To buy an essay on the necessary topic, please, fill in the Free Inquiry form in the top right corner of this page.

Order a custom written paper from professional writer

A thesis statement is a sentence expressing the central claim of your paper. The problem here is not that you are struggling to formulate a thesis "statement" but rather that you haven't yet developed a thesis to be stated. A thesis is a point that you are arguing. Since Brutus is widely acknowledged to be the tragic hero of Julius Caesar, it does not need to be argued; you should look for a thesis which would either need to be supported or which which illuminate some new aspect of the play for a reader. 

The reason the Brutus is widely acknowledge to be the hero of the play is twofold. First, there is no one else who fits the role. Caesar dies early, Mark Antony and Octavian are the antagonists, and Cassius is a morally dubious character. 

Brutus himself has the standard characteristics of the tragic hero as described in Aristotle's Poetics. He is of noble background and character, he has moral stature, and he is engaged in actions of a certain greatness or seriousness. His major flaw is that he does not realize the duplicity of others readily and is perhaps too wedded to an uncompromising ideology, not realizing that Caesar's death would fail to restore the Republic. Because of his strength of moral character, we feel fear and pity at his downfall.

A possible thesis about Brutus might be that "the way that Brutus' participation in assassination of Caesar leads to his replacement by an even more authoritarian dictator shows that an ethical system focused on desired outcomes leads to morally questionable acts with unintended consequences."

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *